In my opinion it's possible, if not likely, that we’ll get more
whistleblowers coming out and admitting they covered up vaccine damage.
In order to help prepare the ground, a little education is in
order.
The intention is to sweep aside the vaccine propagandists whose
main thrust is that the US medical system is excellent, just fine, science is
succeeding on all fronts, so why should we doubt vaccines; don't worry, be
happy.
In the wake of the CDC whistleblower scandal, many such
"defenders of the realm" have emerged.
Expressing generalized outrage and disbelief, they assure us that
no doctor or healthy agency would do great harm to the population.
They tell us that modern medicine, in all its aspects, is
wondrous….
They assure us that whatever the whistleblower, William Thompson,
is saying about published research fraud and vaccines---well, it's simply
wrong. All is well. Rainbows and marshmallows.
How little they know or care.
Documents within the privileged halls of the medical establishment
prove them wrong.
First and foremost among these documents is Dr. Barbara
Starfield's stunning July 26, 2000, review, published in the Journal of the
American Medical Association: "Is US health really the best in the
world?"
Proper and elite credentials were crisply present and accounted
for, all the way along the line. Journal of the American Medical Association.
Dr. Starfield was a widely respected public health expert, working at the Johns
Hopkins School of Public Health.
Her conclusions?
Every year, in the US, the medical system kills 225,000 people.
That's 2.25 MILLION killings per decade.
Of these, FDA-approved medical drugs kill 106,000 Americans per
year. That's a MILLION killings per decade.
In a 2009 interview with Dr. Starfield, she stated that, since her
July 2000 publication, other researchers have pegged the death figures even
higher.
If you Google "FDA, Why Learn About Adverse Drug
Reactions," you will see, on the FDA's own website, a page where the
annual 100,000-death figure is confirmed.
Of course, the FDA takes absolutely no responsibility for this
horrific fact. Being the sole US agency in charge of certifying drugs as safe,
when those drugs kill 100,000 Americans per year...the FDA's conscience doesn't
waver an inch. To put it another way: what conscience?
Want more?
The citation is: BMJ June 7, 2012 (BMJ 2012:344:e3989).
Author, Jeanne Lenzer.
Lenzer refers to a report by the Institute for Safe Medication
Practices: "It calculated that in 2011 prescription drugs were associated
with two to four million people in the US experiencing 'serious, disabling, or
fatal injuries, including 128,000 deaths.'"
The report called this "one of the most significant perils to
humans resulting from human activity."
And here is the final dagger. The report was compiled by outside
researchers who went into the FDA's own database of "serious adverse
[medical-drug] events."
Given what I've written here so far, alert readers will begin to
wonder: how can these medical drugs kill so many people, when medical journals
report, in thousands of published studies, that the drugs are safe?
Ah yes: reliance on published drug-studies.
The gold standard. This is what "the professionals"
point to when challenged. This is the basis of their "science."
It's all a ruse. The published studies declaring the drugs safe
are frauds. An insider among insiders confirms this.
For 20 years, Dr. Marcia Angell was the editor of one of the most
prestigious journals in the world; The New England Journal of Medicine.
On January 15, 2009, the NY Review of Books published Dr. Angell's
devastating assessment of medical literature:
"It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the
clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted
physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this
conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an
editor of The New England Journal of Medicine." -(Marcia Angell, MD,
"Drug Companies and Doctors: A story of Corruption." NY Review of
Books, Jan. 15, 2009.)
Here is another quote of a similar nature, also published in the NY
Review of Books (May 12, 2001, Helen Epstein, "Flu Warning: Beware of Drug
Companies"):
"Six years ago, John Ioannidis, a professor of epidemiology
at the University of Ioannina School of Medicine in Greece, found that nearly
half of published articles in scientific journals contained findings that were
false."
Here's another quote from the same article:
"Last year, GlaxoSmithKline's diabetes drug Avandia was
linked to thousands of heart attacks, and earlier in the decade, the company's
antidepressant Paxil was discovered to exacerbate the risk of suicide in young
people. Merck's painkiller Vioxx was also linked to thousands of heart disease
deaths. In each case, the scientific literature gave little hint of these
dangers."
And finally, here is yet another statement from Marcia Angell,
former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine: "A review of
seventy-four clinical trials of antidepressants, for example, found that
thirty-seven of thirty-eight positive studies [that praised the drugs] were published.
But of the thirty-six negative studies, thirty-three were either not published
or published in a form that conveyed a positive outcome."
It turns out that the informational pipeline that feeds the entire
perception of pharmaceutical medicine is a rank fraud.
So...when CDC whistleblower William Thompson made a public
statement, on August 27, admitting he and his co-authors cooked and buried
vital data in a 2004 Pediatrics study on the MMR vaccine and autism, and when
shocked observers rushed to claim there was really no problem and "the
official science" was safe and true and good and right, and the CDC was
innocent of wrongdoing and it was all a tempest in a teacup, they were entirely
ignorant of the big picture, or they were lying through their teeth.
Whistleblower Thompson was merely adding one more footnote about
medical fraud to a massive and growing encyclopedia of fraud.
The encyclopedia stands, dust-covered, on a remote shelf. The US
government, the CDC, other public health agencies, doctors, medical schools,
drug companies, and those execrable corporate front men---television media
anchors---proceed apace, praising US medical science.
Problem?
What problem? All is well in fairyland. Rainbows and marshmallows…..
