Saving your retirement

California gold mine is for sale

 (Price Reduction)

• Hard rock underground mine located in Siskiyou County, California USA
• Fully permitted production-ready gold property with mill and equipment.
• 48 non patented claims covering 950 acres.
• NI 43-101 report written in 2009, however, none of the reserves are 43-101 compliant.
• Over 1,000,000 inferred ounces per 1996 report.
• The mine was operational as recently as May of 2014 as the owners ran out of capital and personnel.
• Asking for a down payment of $1,500,000.  Final sales price is negotiable.

Remarkable and separate from real estate, equity markets and start up business risks

THE LITIGATION FUNDING PROCESS

THE LITIGATION FUNDING PROCESS

The litigation funding process is not difficult. All it takes is some paperwork and,

if desired, a simple phone call or two, to answer any questions.

It is important for you to know the process, depending upon whether you will be

funding with qualified or non-qualified funds. 

A) Qualified funds are pre-tax dollars. For example: IRAs, 401(k)s, 403(b)s,

457s, SEP IRAs, etc. 

B) Non-qualified funds are after-tax dollars: For example: Bank CDs, Cash,

Are you interested in purchasing an existing publicly traded company?

1. Never been a shell company, free trading
2. Will do terms. Low down
3. low monthly payments.
4. There was a reverse merger done.



Date of original incorporation July 15th 1998
State of incorporation Nevada
Date of Re-Incorporation August 23 2010

State of Re-Incorporation Delaware
Listed as a shell company: No
DTC eligible:
Company financials are current
Taxes due: No
Assets: 0 upon transfer
Liabilities $ 300 K to former owners who will work with new owners to fund
All books and records: Yes
15C211 filed: Yes
Clean: Yes
SEC Reporting status: Non reporting
Market for publicly-Traded securities: OTC Pink Sheets (Caveat Emptor-Was assigned due to reverse merger)


Existing Securities Profile

1) Common Authorized : 74,000,000,000
Common I & O : 5,239,825
Restricted 3,009,013
Float 2,230,812
Authorized Pref A: 100,000,000
   A issued and out: 2,200,000
Authorized Pref B: 200,000,000
   B issued and out: 21,351,750
 Authorized Pref C: 200,000,000
   C issued and out: 0

Buyer paying $1B for Black Eagle 27500

We have a Buyer paying $1B for one or more Black Eagle 27500 from reliable source:

 1. Serial # of the Black Eagle IS to be provided FIRST.

2. The Serial # is checked to confirm legitimacy.

3. AFTER confirmation OF legitimacy 

Serious sellers contact us with requisite serial number of the black eagle after which steps 4 through 10 will be made available.

US. Dollar provider in Hong Kong is looking for a Euro Provider

We have a U.S. Dollar Provider in Hong Kong looking to exchange with a Euro Provider in a 15/10 Transaction. Here are the particulars.

1. $1 Trillion to $5 Trillion.

2. 15/10 to the Euro Provider.

3. Ledger to Ledger in Standard Chartered Bank, Hong Kong.

4. 1.25% available for Euro Side Intermediaries.

Information About the Drug Industry and the Agencies That Control It

In my opinion it's possible, if not likely, that we’ll get more whistleblowers coming out and admitting they covered up vaccine damage.

 

In order to help prepare the ground, a little education is in order.

 

The intention is to sweep aside the vaccine propagandists whose main thrust is that the US medical system is excellent, just fine, science is succeeding on all fronts, so why should we doubt vaccines; don't worry, be happy.

 

In the wake of the CDC whistleblower scandal, many such "defenders of the realm" have emerged.

 

Expressing generalized outrage and disbelief, they assure us that no doctor or healthy agency would do great harm to the population.

 

They tell us that modern medicine, in all its aspects, is wondrous….

 

They assure us that whatever the whistleblower, William Thompson, is saying about published research fraud and vaccines---well, it's simply wrong. All is well. Rainbows and marshmallows.

 

How little they know or care.

 

Documents within the privileged halls of the medical establishment prove them wrong.

 

First and foremost among these documents is Dr. Barbara Starfield's stunning July 26, 2000, review, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association: "Is US health really the best in the world?"

 

Proper and elite credentials were crisply present and accounted for, all the way along the line. Journal of the American Medical Association. Dr. Starfield was a widely respected public health expert, working at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health.

 

Her conclusions?

 

Every year, in the US, the medical system kills 225,000 people. That's 2.25 MILLION killings per decade.

 

Of these, FDA-approved medical drugs kill 106,000 Americans per year. That's a MILLION killings per decade.

 

In a 2009 interview with Dr. Starfield, she stated that, since her July 2000 publication, other researchers have pegged the death figures even higher.

 

If you Google "FDA, Why Learn About Adverse Drug Reactions," you will see, on the FDA's own website, a page where the annual 100,000-death figure is confirmed.

 

Of course, the FDA takes absolutely no responsibility for this horrific fact. Being the sole US agency in charge of certifying drugs as safe, when those drugs kill 100,000 Americans per year...the FDA's conscience doesn't waver an inch. To put it another way: what conscience?

 

Want more?

 

The citation is: BMJ June 7, 2012 (BMJ 2012:344:e3989). Author, Jeanne Lenzer.

 

Lenzer refers to a report by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices: "It calculated that in 2011 prescription drugs were associated with two to four million people in the US experiencing 'serious, disabling, or fatal injuries, including 128,000 deaths.'"

The report called this "one of the most significant perils to humans resulting from human activity."

 

And here is the final dagger. The report was compiled by outside researchers who went into the FDA's own database of "serious adverse [medical-drug] events."

 

Given what I've written here so far, alert readers will begin to wonder: how can these medical drugs kill so many people, when medical journals report, in thousands of published studies, that the drugs are safe?

 

Ah yes: reliance on published drug-studies.

 

The gold standard. This is what "the professionals" point to when challenged. This is the basis of their "science."

 

It's all a ruse. The published studies declaring the drugs safe are frauds. An insider among insiders confirms this.

 

For 20 years, Dr. Marcia Angell was the editor of one of the most prestigious journals in the world; The New England Journal of Medicine.

 

On January 15, 2009, the NY Review of Books published Dr. Angell's devastating assessment of medical literature:

 

"It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine." -(Marcia Angell, MD, "Drug Companies and Doctors: A story of Corruption." NY Review of Books, Jan. 15, 2009.)

 

Here is another quote of a similar nature, also published in the NY Review of Books (May 12, 2001, Helen Epstein, "Flu Warning: Beware of Drug Companies"):

 

"Six years ago, John Ioannidis, a professor of epidemiology at the University of Ioannina School of Medicine in Greece, found that nearly half of published articles in scientific journals contained findings that were false."

 

Here's another quote from the same article:

 

"Last year, GlaxoSmithKline's diabetes drug Avandia was linked to thousands of heart attacks, and earlier in the decade, the company's antidepressant Paxil was discovered to exacerbate the risk of suicide in young people. Merck's painkiller Vioxx was also linked to thousands of heart disease deaths. In each case, the scientific literature gave little hint of these dangers."

 

And finally, here is yet another statement from Marcia Angell, former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine: "A review of seventy-four clinical trials of antidepressants, for example, found that thirty-seven of thirty-eight positive studies [that praised the drugs] were published. But of the thirty-six negative studies, thirty-three were either not published or published in a form that conveyed a positive outcome."

 

It turns out that the informational pipeline that feeds the entire perception of pharmaceutical medicine is a rank fraud.

 

So...when CDC whistleblower William Thompson made a public statement, on August 27, admitting he and his co-authors cooked and buried vital data in a 2004 Pediatrics study on the MMR vaccine and autism, and when shocked observers rushed to claim there was really no problem and "the official science" was safe and true and good and right, and the CDC was innocent of wrongdoing and it was all a tempest in a teacup, they were entirely ignorant of the big picture, or they were lying through their teeth.

 

Whistleblower Thompson was merely adding one more footnote about medical fraud to a massive and growing encyclopedia of fraud.

 

The encyclopedia stands, dust-covered, on a remote shelf. The US government, the CDC, other public health agencies, doctors, medical schools, drug companies, and those execrable corporate front men---television media anchors---proceed apace, praising US medical science.

 

Problem? What problem? All is well in fairyland. Rainbows and marshmallows…..